|
|
Post by craigthalamue on May 30, 2006 0:20:10 GMT -5
Sonics:
Nick Anderson
2002 Sonics 1st Rounder
2004 Sonics 1st Rounder
for
Mookie Blaylock
Hidayet Turkoglu
2003 Rockets 1st Rounder
|
|
|
|
Post by Duncanfan819 on May 30, 2006 1:56:10 GMT -5
Rockets 1st rounder is shit. Turkoglu is bleh. Blaylock isn't bad, but he's old. The 04 Sonics 1st could be good when Craig messes up. I like it for Houston.
|
|
|
|
Post by JScott on May 30, 2006 7:57:05 GMT -5
Sonics fucking got taken, why 2 firsts? What a moron. This trade should be reviewed!
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 30, 2006 12:07:30 GMT -5
This deal looks even worst on the Sonics part since Nick Anderson was traded from the Rockets for Gary Payton....who would've been better than Mookie Blaylock and Day would've been better than Hedo Turkoglu.
The Sonics only plausible defense that he can came with is that his picks are worthless because he made it to the Western Conference Finals last year.
|
|
|
|
Post by craigthalamue on May 30, 2006 14:05:59 GMT -5
This trade isn't about the 1sts for me. If anything I want to make a push this season it isn't going to be done with my current point guard. I needed an upgrade to go with the rest of my starters defence. Mookie is a huge upgrade over Hubert Davis in defence, hands, and offence. I lose Nick Anderson sure that isn't great but he wasn't going to get starter minutes. This deal looks even worst on the Sonics part since Nick Anderson was traded from the Rockets for Gary Payton....who would've been better than Mookie Blaylock and Day would've been better than Hedo Turkoglu. The Sonics only plausible defense that he can came with is that his picks are worthless because he made it to the Western Conference Finals last year. Get over the Twolves and Rockets trade that has no barring on this one. That trade was soley about the bulls 1st, I couldn't have traded my 1sts for payton. |
|
|
|
Post by Mario on May 30, 2006 15:00:25 GMT -5
I like it for the Rockets. Mookie is not what he was 2 years+ ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by allduckeduponquack on May 30, 2006 21:54:26 GMT -5
def rockets, even if sonics traded 1 1st, id still give it to rockets...
|
|
|
|
Post by JScott on May 31, 2006 10:03:03 GMT -5
Sonics, don't you see how hosed you get, next time don't give up so much, you look like a fool.
|
|
|
|
Post by craigthalamue on May 31, 2006 11:06:10 GMT -5
You don't like it Jscott, then find me a better one.
|
|
|
|
Post by JScott on May 31, 2006 22:02:41 GMT -5
Ok, Nick and 1 pick for Mookie.
Hold your fucking ground, don't bend just because Joe doesn't like a deal. Tell him to fuck off if he is asking twice what the guy he is trading is worth.
You all need to develop some back bone when it comes to trading.
|
|
|
|
Post by craigthalamue on May 31, 2006 22:51:54 GMT -5
So, I made a bad deal, deal with it. You don't have to act like a pussy and keep bitching.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on May 31, 2006 23:34:55 GMT -5
So, I made a bad deal, deal with it. You don't have to act like a pussy and keep bitching. Dude he's not bitching...he's giving you criticism. You just wanna come out of this looking like the victim. Everyone who is critcizing you are all the "bad guys" in your eyes. You need to quit your bitching and stop trying to defend this stupid deal that you made. |
|
|
|
Post by craigthalamue on Jun 1, 2006 0:28:50 GMT -5
There is a difference between critizing and what Jscott is doing. First of all if you critized me, I can take it. However, Jscott is trying to get it reviewed which is totally different. If he were to say it sucks that would be okay.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Jun 1, 2006 0:39:06 GMT -5
There is a difference between critizing and what Jscott is doing. First of all if you critized me, I can take it. However, Jscott is trying to get it reviewed which is totally different. If he were to say it sucks that would be okay. If anything this seems like Jscott is fearing Joe getting better than him through this deal and is willing to do anything neccessary to not make it happen. This deal is a reviewable deal....If somebody believes otherwise...then thats crazy. It is a terrible deal that is why he called for a review. To say that John is just doing this because he's afraid of Joe becoming a dominant team again is absurd. The deal is just bad and thats why it's being reviewed. I'm pretty sure that more than enough of the GMs in this league would agree with the call on reviewing this trade. |
|
|
|
Post by craigthalamue on Jun 1, 2006 0:55:17 GMT -5
Yeah, but the problem is there is no clear outline for reviewing trades. Why should a trade be reviewed just because he says it.
|
|
