|
|
Post by punspointgod on Mar 30, 2006 2:33:46 GMT -5
Bulls Trade
Richard Hamilton
2003 Bulls 1st
Lakers Trade
Larry Hughes
2002 Mavericks 1st
the 2 last choices dont make sense but there were so many blank spaces.
|
|
|
|
Post by punspointgod on Mar 30, 2006 2:38:56 GMT -5
i voted bulls, i just might be a huge Larry Hughes fan in real life. but i think B- B- to C+ C+ offense isnt as big a difference as C+ to A- defense.
|
|
|
|
Post by theone853 on Mar 30, 2006 2:46:37 GMT -5
agrees with drew
|
|
|
|
Post by punspointgod on Mar 30, 2006 3:14:11 GMT -5
vote that way then please. |
|
|
|
Post by Duncanfan819 on Mar 30, 2006 3:26:29 GMT -5
I like it for the Bulls also. I'd rather have Hughes' D than Rip's O. I don't think the Bulls 03 1st will be worth anything, and I think the Mavs MIGHT be a lotto, if their players don't fully develop by then. Either way, I don't think the picks will be too significant.
|
|
|
|
Post by Utah on Mar 30, 2006 10:40:37 GMT -5
Hughes any day over Rip. Mavs pick is questionably good.
|
|
|
|
Post by JScott on Mar 30, 2006 11:41:40 GMT -5
I'd take Rip and keep my own pick. Rip is 1 year out of the draft, Hughes is 2-3, you gotta give rip 2-3 seasons of development before you can compare them.
I don't think the AI experiment will pay off, I think the Bulls = screwed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Mar 30, 2006 11:45:23 GMT -5
I just liked Rip Hamilton because his contract is one year longer than Larry Hughes and he's only been through one training camp and his ratings are already the way they are. And I think the Mavs pick won't be as good since they have so many youngsters and I can't imagine all of them becoming busts....
|
|
|
|
Post by theone853 on Mar 30, 2006 17:38:24 GMT -5
actually i think last tc all that went up for him was inside
|
|
|
|
Post by dthomp34 on Mar 30, 2006 18:49:09 GMT -5
While the Mavs got 3 very good players, they aren't Artests or Martins. They're gonna take 2-3 seasons to develop to good players. Great trade for the Lakers though. Rip is 1 TC into the league and will be twice the player that Hughes is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Mar 31, 2006 0:09:59 GMT -5
While the Mavs got 3 very good players, they aren't Artests or Martins. They're gonna take 2-3 seasons to develop to good players. Great trade for the Lakers though. Rip is 1 TC into the league and will be twice the player that Hughes is. Lol so why'd you vote for Rip Hamilton instead of my team? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by dthomp34 on Mar 31, 2006 13:55:53 GMT -5
I didn't vote at all to be honest. I don't really care one way or another ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Mar 31, 2006 17:07:28 GMT -5
Why are Rip Hamilton and Larry Hughes even options?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mario on Apr 2, 2006 14:25:15 GMT -5
You already had Ron Mercer to score. Hughes was your defenseive stopper. If Rip can get his defense up to B or B+ then he will be a really good player...put some points into him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mario on Apr 4, 2006 13:16:07 GMT -5
After Rips TC this was a GREAT deal for the Lakers..
|
|
