|
|
Post by Washington on Sept 18, 2006 22:41:28 GMT -5
Title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Sept 18, 2006 23:36:45 GMT -5
Both.
Grizzlies needed a scoring big man.
Milwaulkee was not going to get anything better than a matching expiring and a mid to late first for him since his contract is so big.
Good deal for both.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesdeane on Sept 24, 2006 15:50:46 GMT -5
Both, because it was a trade that filled the needs of both.
|
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota on Sept 25, 2006 12:41:37 GMT -5
Both in my opinion
|
|
