|
Post by allduckeduponquack on Jul 25, 2006 18:47:10 GMT -5
i know something about having hard schedules look a t clemson's schedule this year and last year: 2005 Schedule Date Opponent Time/Result Sep 3 Texas A&M Won 25-24 Sep 10 @maryland Won 28-24 Sep 17 Miami (Fla.) Lost 30-36 Sep 24 Boston College Lost 13-16 Oct 1 @wake Forest Lost 27-31 Oct 13 @n. Carolina St. Won 31-10 Oct 22 Temple Won 37-7 Oct 29 @georgia Tech Lost 9-10 Nov 5 Duke Won 49-20 Nov 12 Florida St. Won 35-14 Nov 19 @south Carolina Won 13-9 2006 Clemson Football Schedule 09/02/06 Sat Florida Atlantic 09/09/06 Sat @ Boston College 09/16/06 Sat @ Florida State 09/23/06 Sat North Carolina 09/30/06 Sat Louisiana Tech 10/07/06 Sat @ Wake Forest 10/12/06 Thu @ Temple 10/21/06 Sat Georgia Tech 10/26/06 Thu @ Virginia Tech 11/04/06 Sat Maryland 11/11/06 Sat North Carolina State 11/25/06 Sat South Carolina your 06 schedule is easy, I only see 3 guareneed losses(betch/bc/fsu) other than that, you guys could win the rest, but its doubtful, you prolly lose to NC state or SC or Maryland at home. your nonconference schdule sucks.
|
|
|
Post by boomerman25 on Jul 26, 2006 1:00:00 GMT -5
Heat what are you talking about A Weak SEC conference either the east or the west. They don't have a week conference.
East: Flordia Georgia Tenn. South Carolina
West: Alabama Auburn LSU Ark.
Every team on here this year is ranked in the top 25 in someones rankings
|
|
|
Post by allduckeduponquack on Jul 26, 2006 1:10:35 GMT -5
Heat what are you talking about A Weak SEC conference either the east or the west. They don't have a week conference. East: Flordia Georgia Tenn. South Carolina West: Alabama Auburn LSU Ark. Every team on here this year is ranked in the top 25 in someones rankings yeah but do they really deserve top 25? It just seems like if any other big conf teams would play any of these guys, sec would lose but sec is still the strongest all the way down the conf no doubt.
|
|
|
Post by boomerman25 on Jul 26, 2006 12:30:42 GMT -5
I don't understand what your saying
|
|
|
Post by allduckeduponquack on Jul 26, 2006 13:08:35 GMT -5
im saying lots of teams are way overrated Flordia, Legit Georgia, can they ever not be in top 10, even if they lose 5 times? sheesh Tenn, they suck, can they be anymore overrated, they got no qb, their team isnt good South Carolina, better than I thought
West: Alabama, Decent, but never seem to have a breakout year. Croyle was their only hope, and even with him, they couldn't score Auburn, Solid LSU, Overrated... They used to be good, but recently, seem to get lucky, I don't really feel them as a contender. Ark. Don't know much, but they lost to usc like 70-17? lmao, they must really suck
I only see Florida/Alabama/Auburn deserving to get ranked where their ranked. other teams like LSU/Tenn/Georgia are always ranked so high when they don't even desrve it.
|
|
|
Post by boomerman25 on Jul 26, 2006 17:55:10 GMT -5
Georgia was the SEC Champs last year and Alabama had the #1 Defense in the nation. Tenn and LSU Struggle one year out of almost a Decade of dominance. Ark. had one of the best recruiting classes for the last 3 years, not to mention they got the Number 1 Quarterback in the nation the past two years. Coaches poll ranks them like 14th this year.
|
|
|
Post by allduckeduponquack on Jul 27, 2006 1:15:59 GMT -5
but Georgia lost to West Virginia... lol
recruiting means nothing, look at Oregons basketball team, they have some of the best talent in the nation, they got 2 5star recruits starting and 3 4star recruits start, not to mention a couple more 4 stars off the bench...
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Jul 27, 2006 2:33:15 GMT -5
but Georgia lost to West Virginia... lol recruiting means nothing, look at Oregons basketball team, they have some of the best talent in the nation, they got 2 5star recruits starting and 3 4star recruits start, not to mention a couple more 4 stars off the bench... recruiting doesnt mean shit when they start playing the games.... but intill then it gives yall and the rest of talking heads shit to talk about
|
|
|
Post by boomerman25 on Jul 27, 2006 7:57:49 GMT -5
I'm not an ARk. Fan. I'm just makin a point. However West Virgina had a damn good team last year did you pay attention to the season last year at all. They only lost one game to VT that was at the first half of the season before VT lost anyone. Addae who is now a Colt was one of the NCAA leading rushers. The dominated just about every game they played. Hell they deserve alot better ranking then what their gettting this year. Not the mention you not taking in any of the factors of the game. 1: This was a Game that DJ Shockley was injured. 2: they where playing a good team away. If you'd have taken Brady Quinn out of any of ND tuff games last year that they won, I bet they'd have lost.
But, your rite about the recruiting thing. Look at Iowa they have had one of the best recruiting class for the past 5 years and still suck.
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota on Jul 27, 2006 9:57:55 GMT -5
Seattle has a point it seems to me that Jersey is a Pac 10 homer. Of course why wouldn't he but at least me and Seattle are looking outside the box at other confrences. I don't agree that your Pac10 is inthe top 3 confrences and no you are wrong about clemson's schedule. If we paired 75% of the teams in ACC in a game with your one year mighty ducks(harrington era) they would lose at least9 out of 10 games to the acc and probley all too SEC teams. My clemson would have a hard time competing in the SEC. That last sentence just shows that I don't allow my love for Clemson to overshadow my judgment. And about your b-ball team and recruiting Oregon my have had a good recruiting class but they are nothing until they hit the BIG DANCE. I am not saying by anymeans is Clemson better in b-ball hell my team hasn't made the Dance since we had Harold Jameson and Terrell McIntyre.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Jul 29, 2006 2:40:35 GMT -5
exactly
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota on Jul 29, 2006 12:09:33 GMT -5
Chicagp what is your team?
|
|
|
Post by allduckeduponquack on Jul 31, 2006 17:19:43 GMT -5
but Georgia lost to West Virginia... lol recruiting means nothing, look at Oregons basketball team, they have some of the best talent in the nation, they got 2 5star recruits starting and 3 4star recruits start, not to mention a couple more 4 stars off the bench... recruiting doesnt mean shit when they start playing the games.... but intill then it gives yall and the rest of talking heads shit to talk about I know, thats what I was telling sonics... giving ducks as a perfect example
|
|
|
Post by Minnesota on Aug 1, 2006 0:00:33 GMT -5
recruiting doesnt mean shit when they start playing the games.... but intill then it gives yall and the rest of talking heads shit to talk about I know, thats what I was telling sonics... giving ducks as a perfect example Too many quotes i'm lost?
|
|
|
Post by Utah on Aug 1, 2006 11:05:48 GMT -5
and don't forget all the crap teams in the sec also. Miss. st and ole miss. vandy. bunch of junk.
|
|