|
|
Post by Los Angeles Lakers on Feb 17, 2007 17:47:36 GMT -5
Pacers Trade:
Shaquille "Playoff record for points in a game" O'Neal
Jazz Trade:
Tim Duncan
Better for the Pacers because TD is younger. Even though Shaq dropped a playoff record 64 points in the record - how many MVPs and rings does Shaq have?
KG and Shaq didn't work before....I don't think it works again. Also - Kobe is still vastly overrated as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Indiana on Feb 17, 2007 18:00:07 GMT -5
I vote me. Duncan actually might be better than Shaq this year. The only problem is that he never got a chance in Utah. Consider that Shaq's only competition for shot attempts was Sheed, while Duncan had Kobe, Garnett, and Webber (Jamison) to compete with. Duncan averaged 28/14/2/1/3 the last time he was the main guy, and that was even with Kobe taking some shots away from him. With only Sheed taking away shots from him, I'd be surprised if Duncan didn't average the same or better next year than in his last year with the Spurs, while Shaq likely declines, and averages around 20 for Utah.
|
|
|
|
Post by Portland on Feb 17, 2007 18:24:33 GMT -5
i think that shaq will still be solid next year but i agree with hibachi that it's not going to work with KG and Kobe. Duncan is a solid pickup for the pacers and i think he'll definitely shine as the go-to guy for them
|
|
|
|
Post by Denver on Feb 18, 2007 7:22:05 GMT -5
I like it for Indiana more. It's not a terrible trade for Utah, but maybe it'll pay off if he can win a title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Boston on Feb 18, 2007 22:05:41 GMT -5
Duncan is younger.. so Pacers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mario on Feb 19, 2007 12:38:32 GMT -5
well this is just one move for many to come. will most likely make more sense.
|
|
